by Aryeh

Writings of The Rabash

PART ONE OF FOUR

Four Phases of Direct Light

The learning begins with a discernment called “The connection between the Creator and the creatures,” since we do not speak of the Creator Himself and we cannot attain Him. Instead, “By Your actions we know You,” meaning the attainment is only in the operations extending from Him.

This connection is also called “the purpose of Creation.” Our sages perceived that His wish and goal were to benefit His creations. Hence, the order of evolution begins from this discernment until it reaches the souls, whose root is the soul of Adam ha Rishon, which extends from the internality of the worlds BYA.

Allegorically speaking, when the Creator wished to benefit His creatures, He wanted to give them 100 kilograms of pleasure. Hence, He had to create such creations that would want to receive it. We learned that the desire to receive delight and pleasure is the very essence of the creature and the reason why Creation is called “existence from absence.” And He created it so His Thought of delighting His creations would be realized.

And for the will to receive to be born, there had to be an order of four discernments, since one can enjoy something only according to one’s desire for it. This is why we call the Kli (vessel) by the name, “will to receive” or “craving.” Thus, according to the measure of the need is the measure of the craving to satisfy the need.

There are two conditions for the making of a craving:

One should know what to crave. One cannot crave something one has never seen or heard of.
One will not have the desired thing, since if he has already obtained his wish, he loses the craving.

To realize these two conditions, four phases/discernments emerged in the will to receive, which are actually five, along with their root. The fifth discernment is called a Kli, suitable for reception of delight and pleasure.

They follow this order:

1) Keter: His desire to benefit His creations.

2) Hochma: His desire to benefit His creations created a deficiency—existence from absence—and along with it, created the Light. Thus, the abundance and the desire to receive the abundance came together. This is so because the desire still did not know what to want; hence, it was born along with its filling. But if it has its filling, it loses the desire for filling, as the second condition requires. This discernment is called Behina Aleph (first discernment) de Aviut (of the desire).

3) Bina: Since the Light comes from the Giver, the force of bestowal is included in it. Hence, at its end, Hochma wishes to equalize its form, meaning to not be a receiver, but a giver. There is a rule in spirituality: “Any generation of a form is considered a new discernment.” Hence, this discernment is given its own name— Bina, and this is Behina Bet (second discernment) de Aviut. We also learned that the Light that spreads while the lower one wishes to equalize its form is Ohr Hassadim (Light of Mercy), and this is the Light that shines in Bina.

Question: If Bina craves to bestow, why is it considered Aviut Bet (second degree of Aviut)? On the contrary, it seems like it should have been purer than Behina Aleph de Aviut (first degree of Aviut).

Answer: I explain it with an allegory: A person gives his friend a present and the friend receives it. Afterwards, he reconsiders and decides that it is not in his interest to receive, and returns the gift. In the beginning, he was under the influence and domination of the giver; hence, he received. But once he received, he felt that he was the receiver, and that sensation caused him to return the gift.

Lesson: in Behina Aleph, he received due to the domination of the giver, but he still did not feel like a receiver. And when he saw and felt that he was the receiver, he stopped receiving, and this is Behina Bet. In other words, in that state, he felt that he was the receiver, and hence wanted to bestow upon the giver. This is why Behina Bet is called Bina, for it Hitbonena (examined/observed) herself being a receiver and hence wanted to bestow. This is also why we learn that the beginning of the learning is from Bina down.

4) ZA: At its end, Bina received a kind of drive that stems from the purpose of Creation, which she must receive because the purpose of Creation was not for the creatures to engage in bestowal. On the other hand, she also wanted equivalence of form, bestowal. Therefore, she compromised: she would receive Hassadim (mercy) and illumination of the Ohr Hochma (Light of Wisdom).

This is called Behina Gimel de Aviut, since she already extends Hochma, but there are still Hassadim in her. This is the reason for the name Zeir Anpin (small face). Hochma is called Panim (face), as in, “A man’s wisdom makes his face shine,” but it receives this Ohr Hochma in a Zeir, meaning very small extent. But this discernment is still not considered a Kli (vessel), since if it can bestow and receive only an illumination of the Ohr Hochma, it is a sign that its craving to receive is incomplete, since it still has the strength to engage in bestowal, too.

5) Malchut: At its end, Behina Gimel is prompted from Above to receive abundantly because of His desire to benefit His creations. After all, the purpose of Creation was not for the lower ones to receive in Zeir Anpin. Hence, this awakening causes Malchut to have a desire and craving to receive the Ohr Hochma as it shone in Behina Aleph, when she had all the Ohr Hochma.

But the difference between Behina Aleph and Behina Dalet is that in Behina Aleph, it could not be said that she was enjoying the Ohr Hochma, since she still did not possess the craving and deficiency, since the Kli and the abundance came together. But Behina Dalet craves the Ohr Hochma when she does not have it; hence, when she receives, she feels the delight and pleasure that come with fulfilling her wish.

Only this Behina is called a Kli, since it wishes only to receive. All the Behinot (plural for Behina) prior to it are considered “Light without a Kli.” And when this Behina Dalet receives the Light, it is a state called “the world of Ein Sof,” and also “filling the whole of reality.”

Question: If we are dealing with spirituality, where there is no time and no place, what does “filling the whole of reality” mean?

Answer: Let us return to our allegory from the beginning of this explanation, the allegory that He wanted to give His creatures 100 kg of pleasure and therefore had to create 100 kg of deficiency and desire to receive in the creatures, corresponding to the pleasure. When the 100 kg of desire receive the 100 kg of filling, this is called “filling the whole of reality,” meaning no deficiency is left unfulfilled.

And now we will explain the meaning of the name Malchut de Ein Sof: This Malchut, which craves to receive abundance to fill her deficiency, is called “receiving in order to receive.” This means that she receives in order to satisfy her lack. At a later stage, she put an end and Tzimtzum (restriction) on using this Kli. But in the initial stage, which we are dealing with, she still did not make that Sof (end) and Sium (conclusion); hence, this state is still called Ein Sof (no end)

We learned that, at its end, after receiving the abundance, a desire to bestow awakened in Hochma, fitting the Emanator’s wish to bestow. Also, once Malchut received the Light, it evoked within her a desire to bestow, since this Light possesses the power of bestowal. Bina wished to bestow, but failed because in Bina’s way, the purpose of Creation is missing. Even her subsequent reception of illumination in ZA was not enough, since the Creator’s desire to benefit His creations was for abundance, not for ZA. Hence, how could Malchut achieve equivalence of form and obtain the purpose of Creation,too?

It is said about that that she invented something new: Malchut was to receive everything, but unlike Ein Sof, where it was all in order to receive, she would do it in order to bestow. Thus, on the one hand she would be realizing the purpose of Creation of benefiting His creations, since she would be receiving, and on the other hand her aim would be to bestow, which is equivalence of form.

Tzimtzum Aleph

Malchut’s decision that she did not want to receive in order to receive is considered that she repelled the Light. This state is called Tzimtzum (restriction). There is a rule in spirituality that any appearance of a new form is considered a new discernment. Therefore, we should discern two states:

When Behina Dalet received all the Light with a Kli called “craving.” This is called “filling the whole of reality.” It is also called “the world of Ein Sof.”
After she wanted equivalence of form, this state is considered a different world, called “the world of Tzimtzum,” from which the Light departed.

Hence, as we discerned that Hochma received and Bina reflected the Light, Malchut remained as she was, in the state of the world of Ein Sof, receiving all the Light. And now we discern a new Malchut, which reflects the Light.

We should know that in the first state, called Ein Sof, it was “He is One and His Name One,” meaning the Light and the Kli were one discernment. Only after the Tzimtzum was there a distinction of the four phases, or the ten Sefirot, since the Light departed from them.

Question: With this Tzimtzum, the Light departed from all ten Sefirot. This is perplexing, since the Tzimtzum was on reception in order to receive, which is Behina Dalet, and not on the other Behinot!

Answer: The first three Behinot are not considered Kelim, they only prompt an order of development, at the end of which the Kli, called receiving in order to receive, is born and becomes separated from the Giver. But the first three Behinot are still not separated from the Giver.

After Malchut was born, she obtained her causes. Hence, it cannot be said that after the Tzimtzum, the Light remained in the Upper Nine, since they are not Kelim. The only Kli is Malchut, and if she does not want to receive, all the Light departs and she does not receive a thing.

The Ari also says, “The Tzimtzum was equal,” without distinction of degrees.

Question: If this is so, why did we say that the four Behinot became distinct after the Tzimtzum?

Answer: The distinction was made with respect to cause and consequence, but there was no distinction of Above and below.

Question: What do Above and below mean in spirituality?

Answer: Importance—whereas cause and consequence do not imply importance. For example, the Vilna Gaon was a consequence of his father, but who was more important, the cause or the consequence?

We need to understand why there was no distinction of Above and below. Malchut received the Light that “fills the whole of reality,” and this is not considered a deficiency or inferiority in importance. Hence, she could have remained in that state, had she not chosen to make the Tzimtzum.

This is what the Ari wishes to imply when he says that the Tzimtzum was equal, that Malchut was not of inferior importance, but that the Tzimtzum was made through her own choice. But afterwards, when Malchut does not receive due to the prohibition, she becomes inferior in importance. Then, what is farther from Malchut becomes of Higher importance, and what is nearer to Malchut becomes of lower importance.

The Ten Sefirot de Igulim (circles) and the Line of Ein Sof that Fills Them

After the Tzimtzum, the Kelim were left empty, and within them Reshimot (recollections/memories) of the Light that they’d had. They are called “the ten Sefirot de Igulim in the world of Tzimtzum.” They are called Igulim to imply that the issue of Above and below does not apply to them, as it is in a corporeal circle.

And since Malchut is the operator, since she is the actual Kli, Malchut de Igulim returned and extended the Light to receive it in order to bestow. And here we learn a new rule: “A desire in the Upper One becomes a binding law in the lower one.” Hence, now she is forbidden to receive.

I once offered an allegory about that: The eve of a new month is a time for saying the small Yom Kippur (Day of Atonement) prayer and for awakening to repent. Sometimes, a person debates whether or not to fast on that day. It is not mandatory to fast and there is no prohibition on the food, as well. Hence, the choice is in one’s own hands.

If, in the end, a person decides to fast, and later regrets and wishes to eat, the rule is that the food is now forbidden, so “he shall not break his word” concerning the oath. Thus, we see that initially, there was no prohibition on the food, but after he had chosen to avoid eating, the food became forbidden.

Lesson: In the beginning, Malchut did not want to receive through her own choice. But now that she extends the Light again, it is prohibited to receive the Light. And if there is prohibition, there is Above and below in importance. Hence, this extension is called “a line that extends from Ein Sof from Above downwards.”

We also learned that even though the Igulim extended the Light, they received it only from the line. We must understand why this is so: Any new form in spirituality is a new discernment. Hence, there are two kinds of Kelim (plural for Kli):

Kelim in which there is no prohibition on reception.
Kelim that extend now, with the extension of the Light, and whose Malchut is called Malchut de Yosher (directness), on which there is a prohibition to receive, due to the rule: A desire in the Upper One becomes a binding law in the lower one.

We also learn that the Igulim should receive Light from what they had drawn anew. This Light is called “a line.” It contains Above and below in importance, and there is no other Light. This is the meaning of the Igulim having no Light but from the line.

Yet, there is a great difference between Malchut de Igulim and Malchut of the line. Malchut de Igulim had the Light in the form of “filling the whole of reality,” while Malchut de Yosher never had any Light, nor will it ever have Light in its Kli, called “receiving in order to receive.”

Rav Baruch Shalom HaLevi Ashlag

End of Part One of Four.

COURTESY: Bnei Baruch Kabbalah Education & Research Institute

Original Post Link - Explanation of the Article, Preface to the Wisdom of Kabbalah